Friday, 13 April 2012

TELEVISION SCHEDULES: REPEATS! REPEATS! REPEATS!



For the last two years or so I have found myself housebound quite a lot. I therefore have the flexibility to take my leisure time when I want. I love surfing the internet, reading books and watching television. I’m in the UK and have satellite TV so there is plenty of choice – or so you would think. Not only are repeats more common, the same programs are now repeated several times in the same day then again later in the week. I thought it was bad enough when I was growing up if something was repeated within a year. In fact certain channels are based almost entirely on repeats: Dave, Watch and Gold amongst others. Old BBC programs are trotted out at an alarming rate on stations that use advertising: More money for the BBC, more of the same for the customer.

It is outrageous, really. In the UK we are forced to buy a TV license in order to own a TV. That costs nearly 120 pounds a year (190 US dollars). Then there is the satellite or cable bill, typically costing 480 pounds a year (760 USD). That’s a lot of money to pay out to watch an overload of repeats. At first I liked the idea of marathons and would sit down with my snacks and enjoy an evening of Red Dwarf, or Lost, whatever, but the same episodes and the same shows are put on time and again. I’m sure there must be some great stuff archived somewhere that hasn’t seen the light of day for decades.

Another annoying habit of modern TV scheduling is the mass saturation of some shows. It used to be the norm that a drama or comedy would show one episode per week. It was actually quite exiting waiting for a favorite program to come on. Some shows are still done this way, like Fringe, a personal favorite, and I still get that feeling of exitement waiting for the next week’s episode. Some shows however run day after day. I don’t mean soap operas, of course, they are supposed to follow that format. Others, though, say Man Vs. Food for example was shown twice daily in blocks of two on the Dave channel five days a week. I like the program but I think it’s a cheek to put it on for an hour in the evening then show the same shows the next morning, with different evening shows. It’s easy to grow bored of a show if it is on so often.  Going to the other extreme I have noticed that some shows, like Supernatural seem to be on for two or three consecutive weeks then disappears for weeks. It seems to be broadcast in “dribs and drabs” and I’m never sure when it will be on next.

I know that there is a recession going on but surely TV companies aren’t all broke? Is there no good writing talent about? I was particularly annoyed one morning this week (Wednesday I think). It was nine A.M. the TV was switched on to the “Watch” channel and two episodes of a police drama called “The Bill” were about to begin. I was scrolling through news feeds on the PC at the same time and after about five minutes I thought to myself “that dialogue seems familiar” so I turned my attention to the TV and realized that the episode showing had been on the previous day. On Tuesday it was shown between 10.00 A.M. and 11.00 A.M. and on Wednesday it was shown from 9.00 A.M. to 10.00 A.M. Talk about giving the viewer a catch-up. They get a whole episode.

The schedules need sorting out, and companies that make money not only from subscriptions but from advertising as well should give better value for money.

No comments:

Post a Comment